• Apurba Rajbongshi
• Vivek Chauhan

Purpose of The Study: To compare the effectiveness of Mckenzie Method and Inhibitive Distraction on subjects with non-specific neck pain. Study Design: This is a Comparative Study. Participants: Total of 34 subjects was included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria through convenient sampling and divide into two groups. Outcome measure: A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a 10 cms baseline, A Gravity Inclinometer, Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale. Results: The result of present study showed that McKenzie treatment and Inhibitive Distraction, both were found to have significant effect for non specific neck pain. But McKenzie treatment was slightly more effective than Inhibitive Distraction. Conclusion: McKenzie treatment and Inhibitive distraction were both proved to have significant improvement on non specific neck pain. Although between group differences were not particularly large for all outcome measures, mckenzie method is effective treatment for patients with non specific neck pain.

Key Words: Cervical Range of Motion, Inhibitive Distraction, Mckenzie Treatment

"COMPARISION OF MCKENZIE TREATMENT AND INHIBITIVE DISTRACTION ON CERVICAL RANGE OF MOTION, DISABILITY IN SUBJECTS WITH NON SPECIFIC NECK PAIN", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.10, Issue 3, page no.i156-i172, March-2023, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2303826.pdf

"COMPARISION OF MCKENZIE TREATMENT AND INHIBITIVE DISTRACTION ON CERVICAL RANGE OF MOTION, DISABILITY IN SUBJECTS WITH NON SPECIFIC NECK PAIN", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.10, Issue 3, page no. ppi156-i172, March-2023, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2303826.pdf