• AAYUUSHI PANDEY

"The case of Arunkumar v Inspector General of Registration is the first judgment in India where the right to marry under Article 21 of the Constitution has been upheld for transgender persons and holding that 'bride' under the Hindu Marriage Act would apply to transgender persons who identify as women. The court upheld Ms. Sreeja's self-identification as a woman and recognized her right to identify her gender and to be included, along with other intersex/transgender people who identify as women, in the definition of "bride." She noted a violation of her fundamental rights by the state authorities, which refused to register her marriage. As such, the current litigation strategy for gender-diverse parties is to continue to perpetuate the myth that sex is immutable and inevitable, and therefore rightly and morally justifiable when people of one gender or the other are discriminated against based on this immutably fixed identity. "

transgender,bride,equality,hindu,NALSA

"an analysis of arun kumar & ors vs the inspector general of registeration case law", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.11, Issue 6, page no.b76-b81, June-2024, Available :http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2406110.pdf

"an analysis of arun kumar & ors vs the inspector general of registeration case law", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (www.jetir.org | UGC and issn Approved), ISSN:2349-5162, Vol.11, Issue 6, page no. ppb76-b81, June-2024, Available at : http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2406110.pdf